Senators mull protecting ‘passive receivers’ from PFAS liability

By Ellie Borst | 03/21/2024 06:21 AM EDT

The Environment and Public Works Committee is “honing in on” legislation to exempt nonchemical manufacturers from cleaning up “forever chemicals.”

Senate Environment and Public Works ranking member Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) and Chair Tom Carper (D-Del.).

Senate Environment and Public Works Committee ranking member Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) and Chair Tom Carper (D-Del.) are discussing PFAS liability legislation. Francis Chung/POLITICO

Utilities are dialing up the pressure on Congress to shield some industries from liability ahead of an EPA rule on “forever chemicals” — and some top senators are listening.

More than 250 entities have sent letters urging the Environment and Public Works Committee to carve out exemptions before EPA finalizes a rule designating some PFAS — or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances — as hazardous substances under the Superfund law. That designation would trigger stricter reporting requirements and put polluters on the hook for cleaning up PFOA and PFOS, two of the most notorious PFAS tied to serious health risks such as cancer.

A range of entities — including airports, farmers, water utilities, waste managers, landfills, cities and other local offices — are so-called passive receivers and want exemptions that protect them from becoming responsible parties over chemicals they did not create. PFOA and PFOS persist in the environment and nearly half of U.S. tap water systems.

Advertisement

EPA has said it only intends to go after chemical manufacturers and the Defense Department, but the agency can not carve out exemptions under the law. That power rests solely with Congress — and on Wednesday, members of the EPW panel seemed receptive to a legislative fix.

GET FULL ACCESS